Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 12:30
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
In space, no one can hear you scream — But it still gets incredibly noisy - Salon.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Eum labore eaque vel aspernatur magnam modi rem.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Oral Bacteria Diversity Linked to Depression Symptoms - Neuroscience News
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
About 700 Marines being mobilized in response to LA protests - CNN
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sega's leaked sales figures show Sonic's new frontier is heading in the right direction - Eurogamer
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
What does it mean when someone is pretending to be me?
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.